The safety of food contact materials (FCMs) is a fundamental component of global food safety regulation. Food contact materials—such as packaging, kitchenware, processing equipment, coatings, and utensils—can directly or indirectly influence the safety, quality, and integrity of food products. To prevent contamination and protect consumer health, governments around the world have established comprehensive legal frameworks that regulate the composition, manufacture, and use of materials that come into contact with food.

Because food packaging and processing equipment are traded globally, regulatory compliance for FCMs has become an essential challenge for manufacturers, suppliers, and importers. Ensuring compliance involves understanding and meeting a complex set of international, regional, and national standards, all designed to prevent the migration of hazardous substances into food and to safeguard public health.

1. The Purpose and Scope of FCM Regulation

Food contact materials include a wide range of substances and products, such as:

• Plastics, rubbers, ceramics, glass, metals, and paper-based materials

• Printing inks, adhesives, and coatings used in packaging

• Processing equipment and reusable containers

The primary regulatory objectives are to:

• Prevent the migration of harmful chemicals into food.

• Ensure chemical stability and inertness of materials during food processing, storage, and transport.

• Protect consumer health and maintain food quality.

• Enable traceability and accountability along the supply chain.

• Promote sustainability through the regulation of recycling and reuse in contact materials.

2. International Principles and Harmonization

Although each region maintains its own regulatory structure, global frameworks and international bodies play a key role in harmonizing safety approaches for food contact materials:

• Codex Alimentarius Commission (FAO/WHO) – Provides general principles for food safety, including guidelines on packaging materials, good manufacturing practice (GMP), and chemical migration.

• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) – Develops testing guidelines and databases for assessing chemical safety.

• ISO (International Organization for Standardization) – Publishes standards such as ISO 22000 for food safety management systems and ISO 18604 for packaging recyclability.

• Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) – Recognized worldwide as the foundation for ensuring consistent production quality and minimizing contamination risk.

While global harmonization remains incomplete, these frameworks guide regional authorities toward scientifically consistent and risk-based regulatory systems.

3. Regional Regulatory Frameworks

a. European Union (EU)

The European Union operates one of the most comprehensive and science-based frameworks for food contact materials. The cornerstone of EU regulation is:

• Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 – Establishes general safety principles for all materials and articles intended to come into contact with food.

  • Requires that materials do not transfer constituents to food in quantities that could endanger human health, change food composition, or alter sensory qualities.

  • Mandates traceability and labeling throughout the supply chain.

This regulation is supported by more specific measures, including:

• Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 – Governs plastic materials and articles, providing a positive list of authorized substances, specific migration limits (SMLs), and overall migration limits (OMLs).

• Regulation (EC) No 2023/2006 – Establishes Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements for all FCMs.

• Specific Directives or Measures – Cover materials such as regenerated cellulose film (2007/42/EC), ceramics (84/500/EEC), active and intelligent packaging (450/2009), and recycled plastics (2022/1616).

Member states may also have national measures for materials not yet harmonized at the EU level, such as paper and board, printing inks, and coatings.
Compliance is demonstrated through migration testing, declaration of compliance (DoC), and supporting documentation maintained by manufacturers.

b. United States

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates food contact materials under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

Key regulatory mechanisms include:

• Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) – Lists authorized substances for specific material categories (e.g., 21 CFR 177 for polymers, 21 CFR 175 for adhesives, and 21 CFR 178 for adjuvants and production aids).

• Food Contact Notifications (FCN) – Allow manufacturers to obtain FDA clearance for new substances used in FCMs. Once an FCN is approved, it applies exclusively to the notifier and specific conditions of use.

• Threshold of Regulation (ToR) exemptions – Permit use of substances with negligible migration and risk.

• Good Manufacturing Practices (21 CFR 174.5) – Mandate sanitary and safe production conditions for all food contact articles.

The U.S. approach is substance-based and relies heavily on toxicological evaluation, exposure assessment, and migration modeling. It provides flexibility for innovation but places responsibility on manufacturers to ensure safety under intended use conditions.

c. Canada

Health Canada’s Food Directorate regulates FCMs under the Food and Drugs Act. While Canada has no single comprehensive list equivalent to the EU’s positive list, it maintains an internal database of reviewed and approved substances.
Manufacturers may voluntarily submit pre-market notifications to obtain safety evaluations for new materials. Canada’s approach aligns closely with the U.S. FDA model and recognizes many FDA clearances as supportive evidence.

d. Asia-Pacific Region

The Asia-Pacific region includes both harmonized systems and developing frameworks:

• China:
  The National Health Commission (NHC) administers a well-defined system under:

  • GB 4806.1–2016: General safety standard for FCMs.

  • GB 9685–2016: Positive list of additives for food contact materials.

  • GB 4806.7–12: Series for specific materials such as plastic, paper, rubber, and coatings.
    Compliance involves meeting migration limits, labeling requirements, and local testing.

• Japan:
  Governed by the Food Sanitation Act, amended in 2020 to introduce a positive list system for synthetic resins, aligning Japan more closely with EU and FDA approaches. Testing and documentation are required for all new materials.

• Australia & New Zealand:
  Food Standards Code (Standard 1.4.1) prohibits packaging materials that may transfer harmful substances to food. The Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) also regulates the chemicals used in FCMs.

• India:
  Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) oversees packaging safety under the Food Safety and Standards (Packaging) Regulations, 2018, covering plastics, metals, glass, paper, and multilayer laminates.

e. Latin America

Regulatory systems in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile are based largely on Mercosur Resolutions, particularly:

• Mercosur GMC Resolution No. 03/92 – General principles for FCMs.

• Mercosur GMC Resolution No. 32/07 – Technical regulation for plastic materials and articles.

These are harmonized with EU and FDA concepts, including positive lists and migration testing requirements. Brazil’s ANVISA enforces compliance at the national level.

f. Middle East and Africa

Countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) follow the Gulf Standardization Organization (GSO) guidelines, which draw heavily from Codex and EU frameworks.
In Africa, national systems are developing rapidly. South Africa’s NRCS (National Regulator for Compulsory Specifications) and the African Food Safety Platform promote harmonization and adherence to international best practices.

4. Testing, Documentation, and Declaration of Compliance

Compliance for FCMs involves three fundamental elements:

1. Migration Testing – Measurement of overall and specific migration using food simulants under defined time and temperature conditions.

2. Risk Assessment – Evaluation of potential exposure to ensure levels are below toxicologically acceptable limits.

3. Documentation and Traceability – Maintenance of a Declaration of Compliance (DoC), test reports, raw material certificates, and manufacturing records.

Testing laboratories must follow ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, ensuring validity and reproducibility of analytical results.

5. Emerging Trends and Challenges

The regulatory landscape for food contact materials continues to evolve in response to scientific, technological, and societal developments:

• Recycled Materials and Circular Economy:
  The drive for sustainability has led to the regulation of recycled plastics (e.g., EU Regulation 2022/1616) and increased scrutiny of chemical safety in secondary materials.

• Nanomaterials and Novel Substances:
  Nanotechnology introduces new safety considerations due to potential migration and bioavailability of nanoparticles. Regulators are developing specific guidance for their risk assessment.

• Bio-based and Compostable Materials:
  As plant-based and biodegradable packaging grows, regulators face challenges in ensuring consistent safety testing for non-traditional polymers.

• Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS):
  Increasing global restrictions on PFAS in packaging due to persistence and toxicity concerns.

• Global Harmonization Efforts:
  Cooperation between FDA, EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), and WHO continues to promote convergence of safety assessment methodologies and data-sharing mechanisms.

6. Conclusion

Worldwide regulatory compliance for food contact materials represents a highly specialized intersection of food safety, chemical regulation, and materials science. Despite regional variations, the underlying principles are consistent: materials must be safe, inert, traceable, and manufactured under controlled conditions.

For manufacturers, achieving global compliance demands:

• Adherence to internationally recognized Good Manufacturing Practices.

• Rigorous migration and toxicological testing.

• Transparent supply chain documentation.

• Awareness of emerging sustainability and chemical safety trends.

As consumer expectations shift toward sustainability and clean-label packaging, regulators are tightening oversight of materials composition and environmental impact. The future of FCM regulation lies in greater global harmonization, data transparency, and innovation in safer, sustainable materials—ensuring that food contact safety continues to evolve alongside advances in science and technology.

Do not hesitate to contact us directly to talk about your challenges regarding the global regulatory compliance for food contact materials.